邱太三將外交困境卸責國民黨 昧於事實
陸委會主委邱太三昨（20日）接受媒體專訪時，宣稱中共當局承認「九二共識」並向國際宣稱台灣是內政問題，因中國國民黨無能力澄清，致使台灣在國際被排擠，要參與國際組織還得仰賴中共當局鼻息。國民黨對此表示，邱太三上任已近2個月，應研讀「九二共識」緣由，並請教蔡英文總統是如何「仰人鼻息」以參與2016年5月的世界衛生大會（WHA）。
國民黨重申，「九二共識」是後來對1992年台海兩岸所獲致共識的概括表述，對李登輝和馬英九政府的意涵就是求同存異的「一中各表」，也是2008年5月起，兩岸恢復制度化協商的重要基礎，國民黨及其政府主張「一中各表」的「一中」就是中華民國，從無第二種解釋。
國民黨指出，邱太三刻意忽視兩岸曾既各自表述法理與政治立場，又可以推進兩岸功能性合作，表示他還是裝作不明白「九二共識」的「創造性模糊」。
邱太三將目前外交困境卸責於國民黨，國民黨指出，邱太三根本是昧於事實，而且否定了當時政府官員的努力。國民黨請問蔡英文總統能否在任內提升邦交國數目、有意義參與重要國際組織？能否不與中共唱和，並依法節制，真正堅定地捍衛中華民國？
國民黨質疑蔡英文總統在國際空間擴展上節節敗退，其執政團隊卻始終忽視兩岸關係對台灣國際空間的關鍵影響，又提不出解方。
國民黨指出，蔡英文總統執政後的第一週，拿著註明「符合一中原則」的世界衛生大會邀請函，指派林奏延前衛福部長率團出席，會議發言絕口不提「台灣」，當時才是仰人鼻息。
國民黨質疑邱太三顯然知道兩岸之間走不通，但又受到美國拜登（Joe Biden）政府要求兩岸進行建設性對話的壓力，所以除了向對岸進行毫無實質內容的喊話，還在台灣內部找替罪羔羊。
國民黨敬告蔡英文總統及其國安團隊，在面臨兩岸困境時，不要只會卸責於國民黨，要有執政者的肩膀，拿出真正的辦法來。國民黨強調，抹黑了國民黨「求同存異、務實協商」的基本主張，對於兩岸關係「春暖花開」不會有實質助益。
Chiu Tai-san Mistakenly Blames KMT for Diplomatic Dilemma
In an interview with local media outlets yesterday, Chairman Chiu Tai-san (邱太三) of the Mainland Affairs Council stated that the Chinese Communist Party（CCP）authorities recognized the "1992 Consensus" and declared to the world that Taiwan falls under its internal affairs. As a result, Chiu went on to say that Taiwan has been excluded from the international community. To participate in international organizations, Taiwan needs to obtain the CCP’s permission, since the Kuomintang (KMT) did not actively clarify that Taiwan does not fall under the internal affairs of the CCP authorities. The KMT stated that Chiu Tai-san has been in office for about two months, so he should have studied the origin of the "1992 Consensus" and asked President Tsai Ing-wen（蔡英文） how the DPP administration had been able to participated in the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May 2016.
The KMT reiterated that the "1992 Consensus" was a general statement on the consensus reached by both sides of the Taiwan Strait in 1992. The Lee Teng-hui（李登輝）and Ma Ying-jeou（馬英九） administrations attempted to seek common ground while shelving differences. This was the foundation of the cross-Strait dialogue in May 2008. The KMT government advocated that the "China" in "one China with different interpretations" was the Republic of China (ROC). There has never been a second interpretation.
The KMT pointed out that Chiu Tai-san appeared to deliberately ignore the fact that both sides of the Taiwan Strait once expressed their legal principles and political positions on which both sides agreed to cooperate, indicating that he was feigning a lack of understanding about the "creative ambiguity" of the "1992 Consensus."
Chiu Tai-san blamed the KMT for the nation’s current diplomatic difficulties. The KMT rebuked that Chiu Tai-san appeared ignorant of the facts and had denied the efforts of the Ma Ying-jeou administration. The KMT wants to ask President Tsai Ing-wen whether the number of countries seeking formal diplomatic relations with the ROC could be increased and then meaningfully participate in important international organizations during her presidency. The KMT wants to know if she should be able to firmly safeguard the Republic of China (ROC).
The KMT questioned that a solution to participating in international organizations could not be reached because the ruling DPP consistently ignored the key impact of cross-Strait relations on the ROC’s international space.
The KMT indicated that in the week following Tsai Ing-wen assumed office in May 2016, her administration received the WHO invitation, marking "in accordance with the one-China principle," and she dispatched then Minister of Health and Welfare Lin Zou-yan (林奏延) to attend the annual meeting. His speech at the assembly never mentioned "Taiwan." In fact, Taiwan's participation in the WHA was subject to CCP’s whims.
The KMT questioned whether Chiu Tai-san was aware that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait could not communicate in the way the DPP has expected and are otherwise pressured by the Biden administration to resume a constructive dialogue. In addition to making meaningless statements towards Mainland Chinese authorities, Chiu always blamed KMT without any concrete reasons.
The KMT warned the Tsai Ing-wen administration that when facing a cross-Strait dilemma, the blame cannot solely be placed on the KMT without a substantive reason. The KMT emphasized that discrediting the Kuomintang's basic propositions would not be of any substantial help in improving cross-Strait relations.
（This is an abridged version of an official KMT Chinese language press release）
